When flying RNAV departure, what may reduce the ability to satisfy ATC path expectations?

Manually selecting bank limiting (half bank) can indeed reduce the ability to satisfy ATC path expectations during an RNAV departure. When operating in half-bank mode, the aircraft's roll response is limited, which can impact its ability to make steep turns that may be required to adhere to the designated RNAV departure path. This limitation means that the aircraft may not achieve the necessary turn rate or bank angle to follow the predetermined waypoints efficiently, potentially leading to deviations from the expected flight path that ATC relies on for traffic management and safety.

Other options, while they may have implications for flight operations, do not directly relate to the RNAV path adherence in the same way. Using Jeppesen charts is a standard practice in aviation, which provides navigational guidance, and does not inherently affect the aircraft's ability to follow the RNAV path. Flying below minimum visibility requirements pertains to external visibility issues but does not directly influence the avionics or flight path adherence with RNAV procedures. Engaging autopilot during takeoff, while it can be a procedural consideration, does not impact the ability to comply with RNAV departures as directly as the impact of bank angle control. Each of these elements is essential to understand for safe and efficient operations, but the limitation